<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Parenthetical &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parenthetical.net/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parenthetical.net</link>
	<description>YA reviews and book geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Window Farms</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2010/04/04/window-farms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2010/04/04/window-farms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old-School Apocalypse April]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t have time to read and review enough old-school apocalypse books to fill up a whole month, so please enjoy some pre-apocalyptic technology: Window Farms: &#8220;hydroponic edible gardens for urban windows&#8221; After peak oil, when the large-scale food distribution system breaks down, we can dig a bunch of plastic water bottles out of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have time to read and review enough old-school apocalypse books to fill up a whole month, so please enjoy some pre-apocalyptic technology: <a href="http://www.windowfarms.org/">Window Farms</a>: &#8220;hydroponic edible gardens for urban windows&#8221;</p>
<p>After peak oil, when the large-scale food distribution system breaks down, we can dig a bunch of plastic water bottles out of the nearest landfill and hang them in our windows to grow food! Or I might try it now, because it&#8217;s awfully damn cool.</p>
<p>(Thanks, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=125504307">Weekend Edition</a>!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2010/04/04/window-farms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;In a world&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/23/in-a-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/23/in-a-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/23/in-a-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the (Environmental Protection) Agency&#8217;s Earth Day history page: EPA was born in 1970 &#8211; a time when rivers caught fire and cities were hidden under dense clouds of smoke. We&#8217;ve made remarkable progress since then in protecting human health and safeguarding the natural environment. Remember 40 years ago, when life was like a science [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33062">(Environmental Protection) Agency&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.epa.gov/earthday/history.htm">Earth Day history</a> page:</p>
<blockquote><p>EPA was born in 1970 &#8211; a time when rivers caught fire and cities were hidden under dense clouds of smoke. We&#8217;ve made remarkable progress since then in protecting human health and safeguarding the natural environment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Remember 40 years ago, when life was like a science fiction movie?  Isn&#8217;t it great how much better things are now?  Goooooo, EPA!</p>
<p>(I&#8217;d find depressingly ironic news links for the above, but you all know the drill anyway and I&#8217;m already cranky enough today.  Go read <a href="http://www.grist.org">Grist</a> or something.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/23/in-a-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apocalypse how?</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/07/apocalypse-how/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/07/apocalypse-how/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-apocalyptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YA science fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote recently about the fact that my mental picture of &#8220;apocalypse&#8221; is stuck in the Cold War &#8212; instantaneous disaster, as opposed to the currently more likely slow(-ish) environmental collapse. I mused about what current YA readers of science fiction will picture, which made me wonder: other than Uglies, what&#8217;s being written in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote recently about the fact that <a href="http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=252">my mental picture of &#8220;apocalypse&#8221; is stuck in the Cold War</a> &#8212; instantaneous disaster, as opposed to the currently more likely slow(-ish) environmental collapse.  I mused about what current YA readers of science fiction will picture, which made me wonder: other than <i>Uglies</i>, what&#8217;s being written in the post-apocalyptic vein these days?</p>
<p>So I read four YA novels written around the turn of the 21st century, set in post-apocalyptic-ville (or immediately-pre-apocalyptic-ville):</p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/secret_under_skin.JPG" alt="Secret Under My Skin"/ width=100/> <img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/star_split.gif" alt="Star Split"/> <img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/songs_power.jpg" alt="Songs of Power" width=100/> <img src="/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/among_hidden.JPG" alt="Among the Hidden"/> </p>
<p><b><i>The Secret Under My Skin</i>, Janet McNaughton:</b> Former street kid Blay, now a ward of the totalitarian state, is chosen to help Marrella prepare for her investiture as a bio-indicator.  Bio-indicators used to be ritual sacrifices to keep the planet&#8217;s toxins at bay; now they&#8217;re part of an underground movement to bring science and democracy back to Canada.  Blay comes to live with the scientist and resistance leader who are training Marrella, and discovers truths about her own past and future.</p>
<p><b>Apocalypse how?</b> Here we get two apocalypses* for the price of one: the gradual environmental destruction I was hoping to find in one of these books, which happened well before the characters&#8217; lifetimes, plus a more recent &#8220;technocaust&#8221; (the mass murder of scientists, who are blamed for the environmental disaster).  A neo-Dark Ages, scientists-as-shamans, complex political machinations, brave revolutionaries, &#8220;love makes a family,&#8221; three-dimensional adults&#8230; way to push all my post-apocalyptic buttons, Janet!  And it&#8217;s very well-written, to boot.  I heart this book!</p>
<p><b><i>Star Split</i>, Kathryn Lasky:</b> Lasky doesn&#8217;t mess around &#8212; this novel is set all the way in 3038, when everyone is cured of genetic diseases <i>in utero</i>, and the educated elite are given an extra chromosome to which they can attach extra abilities and talents.  The entire culture is focused on genetic manipulation, and the highest crime is unauthorized &#8220;umbellation&#8221; (cloning).  </p>
<p><b>Apocalypse how?</b> Well, that&#8217;s not so clear.  This was my least favorite of the bunch, because (among other things) it&#8217;s terribly scattered.  Of course heroine Darci finds out that her parents cloned her, using added DNA from the less-genetically-manipulated underclass Originals.  Turns out her parents are part of a resistance movement, which is resisting the permanent change of the human race into&#8230;something else, we&#8217;re told.  It&#8217;s never made clear what that means, or why we don&#8217;t want that to happen, or what the larger context is.  It only matters that Darci and her clone find that their futures are (gasp!) not predetermined, because they Have Souls and that means God Loves Them.    </p>
<p><b><i>Songs of Power</i>, Hilari Bell:</b> Imina, the great-granddaughter of an Inuit shaman, wants to be a shaman herself, but she&#8217;s stuck in an undersea habitat with her scientist parents and a bunch of other scientists who totally don&#8217;t get her belief in magic.  But when mysterious Magic-Makers mess with their habitat, only Imina can figure out what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p><b>Apocalypse how?</b> The reason the habitat (and many others like it) exists is that a revolutionary group (with Commie-esque slogans, but no clear agenda) semi-accidentally released a genetic virus that will render the nutrients in all terrestrial plants unavailable to humans within a few years.  Humanity will need to feed itself from the sea for a few decades until the virus runs its course, so the habitat is studying ways to increase plankton growth and thereby increase the populations of fish we eat.  Aside from the gaping scientific holes in this scheme, it struck me as a lot of contortions just to get to &#8220;we can&#8217;t feed ourselves the usual way anymore.&#8221;  Bell forced man-made instantaneous apocalypse to do the duty of longer-term environmental apocalypse.</p>
<p>(Oh, and this one&#8217;s for you, <a href="http://theoystersgarter.com">Miriam</a>: the Magic-Makers, with whom only Imina can communicate?  They turn out to be the noble Whales, defending their noble way of life from human encroachment.  Is that better than dolphins, at least?  Maybe?)</p>
<p><b><i>Among the Hidden</i>, Margaret Peterson Haddix:</b> This one&#8217;s similar to <i>Star Split</i> in that it&#8217;s about a controversial birth policy: after a national famine, followed by a military coup, families are only allowed two children.  Luke is a third, born to a mother with more sentiment than sense: &#8220;You just happened, [and] I wouldn&#8217;t even let your dad talk about&#8230; getting rid of you.&#8221;  So he&#8217;s stuck in his attic bedroom, with no hope for a real life ever &#8212; thanks, Mom!  Until one day he sees another third child out the window, and gets caught up in her revolutionary schemes.</p>
<p><b>Apocalypse how?</b> Until Luke meets Jen halfway through the book, we know virtually nothing about the politics of this world &#8212; Luke&#8217;s parents are uneducated subsistence farmers, but Jen&#8217;s are high-ranking government officials who allow her internet access.  Jen&#8217;s view of the world is skewed too, though, so we never get a very clear picture of what, exactly, happened to cause the famine, or what the situation is now.  Thumbs up to the atmospheric ambiguity, thumbs down to the confusion.</p>
<p>So for those keeping score at home, we have one genetic apocalypse, two famine apocalypses (one man-made and one probably not), and one environmental apocalypse with an added touch of genocide.  (And one Sam, grateful that most of the books weren&#8217;t so complex or deep, because otherwise she&#8217;d be extremely freaked out.)  I suppose it&#8217;s easier to set up a high-stakes challenge for the characters if you set the apocalypse <i>right now</i> or <i>right before they were born</i>, rather than building over decades/centuries.  </p>
<p>And hey, if you need an insta-pocalypse, and nuclear war is <i>so</i> 1975, you could always have asteroids slam into the moon and knock it off course!  I haven&#8217;t read Susan Beth Pfeffer&#8217;s <a href="http://bookshelvesofdoom.blogs.com/bookshelves_of_doom/2006/11/life_as_we_knew.html"><i>Life As We Knew It</i></a>, but&#8230;um&#8230;that&#8217;s not likely to happen, is it?</p>
<p>*&#8221;Now I find myself needing to know the plural of &#8216;apocalypse&#8217;.&#8221; &#8211; Riley, <i>Buffy</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/04/07/apocalypse-how/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duck and cover</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/20/duck-and-cover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/20/duck-and-cover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-apocalyptic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While cataloging Alas, Babylon, a classic 1959 apocalyptic sci-fi novel by Pat Frank, it occured to me how quaint nuclear holocausts seem to me now. Oh, the Russians bombed us into the Stone Age? How terrifying! We tore our short-sleeved dress shirts, and the girls in the typing pool were vaporized! I hardly ever read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While cataloging <i>Alas, Babylon</i>, a classic 1959 apocalyptic sci-fi novel by Pat Frank, it occured to me how quaint nuclear holocausts seem to me now.  Oh, the Russians bombed us into the Stone Age?  How terrifying!  We tore our short-sleeved dress shirts, and the girls in the typing pool were vaporized!  I <a href="http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=63">hardly ever read post-apocalyptic stories anymore</a>, but I feel like I would panic less at reading post-nuclear apocalypse than post-environmental apocalypse.  In the same way that Holocaust novels feel like history, but stories of Darfur feel like horror &#8212; if the fear is in the past, it can go in a box and it won&#8217;t make me as ill.  </p>
<p>At the same time, I realize how much my child-of-the-&#8217;80s diet of nuclear apocalypse stories informed my image of what &#8220;apocalypse&#8221; means.  In my most panic-stricken moments, what I picture are &#8220;everything is destroyed all at once&#8221; scenarios, which have somehow resulted in a blighted Earth populated by roving bands led by Mad Max warlords (with whom I will have to pay my way with my knowledge of gardening and cooking&#8230;you can see how quickly this gets ridiculous).  As R pointed out, though, that&#8217;s highly unlikely to happen &#8212; at least not in my lifetime, in my country.  The destruction will be slower, more drawn-out, in smaller pockets and less equitably distributed among rich and poor.  Not to diminish the terrible things that we&#8217;re heading for, obviously.  But this apocalypse fear is such an integral part of my personal mythology and it was interesting to see that reflect how much a child of the &#8217;80s I really am.</p>
<p>(I wonder what my students who think about these things will have as their image of apocalypse?  It will be environmental, almost certainly.  Perhaps it will be like in Scott Westerfeld&#8217;s popular <i>Uglies</i>, where an oil-eating bacteria literally stopped us all in our tracks &#8212; the characters find skeletons in cars stuck in apocalyptic traffic jams.  If you think about it, that doesn&#8217;t make much sense: why wouldn&#8217;t they have gotten out and walked, for heaven&#8217;s sake?  But then, Scott is a child of the Cold War, too.)  </p>
<p><b>Read-alikes:</b> <i>City of Ember</i>, Jeanne duPrau; <i>This Time of Darkness</i>, H. M. Hoover; <i>Nightfall</i>, Isaac Asimov and Robert Silverberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/20/duck-and-cover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: In Defense of Food</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/18/update-in-defense-of-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/18/update-in-defense-of-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miriam and Eric&#8217;s fabulous science blog The Oyster&#8217;s Garter continues my discussion of food politics. Make sure to see my comment, which hopefully clarifies the difference between IDOF and TOD: to wit, IDOF is about personal nutrition/health choices; TOD is about environmental impact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miriam and Eric&#8217;s fabulous science blog The Oyster&#8217;s Garter <a href="http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/02/18/guilty-as-charged/">continues my discussion of food politics</a>.  Make sure to see my comment, which hopefully clarifies the difference between IDOF and TOD: to wit, IDOF is about personal nutrition/health choices; TOD is about environmental impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2008/02/18/update-in-defense-of-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omnivore&#8217;s Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.parenthetical.net/2006/12/29/omnivores-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parenthetical.net/2006/12/29/omnivores-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parenthetical.net/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally finished Michael Pollan&#8217;s The Omnivore&#8217;s Dilemma, in which he traces four meals &#8211; fast food, industrial organic (a la Whole Foods), local organic, and hunted/gathered by himself &#8211; from their origins in fields and factory farms to his table. I don&#8217;t say this very often &#8211; in fact, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally finished Michael Pollan&#8217;s <i>The Omnivore&#8217;s Dilemma</i>, in which he traces four meals &#8211; fast food, industrial organic (a la Whole Foods), local organic, and hunted/gathered by himself &#8211; from their origins in fields and factory farms to his table.  I don&#8217;t say this very often &#8211; in fact, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve ever said it &#8211; but &#8220;if you read one book this year, it should be this one.&#8221;  If you care about food, the environment, your health, or animal rights (and really, that should include everyone, though of course it sadly doesn&#8217;t), you need to read this book.  It is the single most stunning piece of non-fiction I have ever read.  Chapter 11, about the interconnected relationships among  grass, forest, grubs, and animals on <a href="http://www.polyfacefarms.com/">Polyface Farm</a> that leave the land <i>healthier</i> than it was before agriculture, was the most hopeful and beautiful thing I have read in a very long time.  </p>
<p>(Enough hyperbole for you?  I really do mean it, though.  I would happily lend it to you, except I gave my copy to my library.  So you&#8217;ll need to check it out or buy it yourself.  Do so.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parenthetical.net/2006/12/29/omnivores-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

