“Is there anything on this list that’s not depressing?”

My initial response to Meghan Cox Gurdon’s incendiary WSJ column is here, but it got crazy long and I decided this topic needed its own post.

Ok, so there’s a lot of dark YA lit because teens want to read it — both the Literature and the popcorn. There’s also tons of light YA lit. (And if the mother at the beginning of Gurdon’s column couldn’t find any, perhaps she should have asked an experienced professional — at an indie bookstore or library if she couldn’t find one at Barnes & Noble — rather than fumbling through the YA section on her own.) Sure, there are trends, but YA is no more one-note than adult lit is.

But there is an awful lot of dark, heavy stuff on the recommended lists — the books we as educators assign and give awards to. In the last few years of Printz winners there’s abject poverty, environmental apocalypse, child labor, abusive parents, children as murderers, terminal illness, child abandonment, suicide, terrorism, and teen pregnancy, just to name a few. These are excellent, deserving books and I adore many of them, as do my students. But the darkness seems over-represented. (Note: tone is important, obviously, and I don’t want to make this all about a context-free list of content markers. But I would argue that while every one has some form of “happy ending,” the tone of most of these books is just as dark as their content implies.)

There are plenty of exceptions, obviously, but there is a general belief in our culture that “dark and heavy” = quality. This reaches far beyond YA lit; for instance, how often does a romantic comedy win Best Picture? Every year our high school students look at the summer reading list and say, “Is there anything on here that’s not depressing?” And the list is mostly adult books! (The answer, by the way, is definitely yes, but we had to add some lighter books deliberately for that reason, and they often aren’t “canon.”) Do we believe that it requires more skill to make someone cry than laugh? Is it more worthy to address painful subjects? Do we feel that stories have more truth if they end tragically with a touch of uplift? I’m asking these questions honestly; my mind’s not set here and I hope you’ll tell me what you think about my premise or the reasons behind it.

It does seem worth taking a look at our instinct, as gatekeepers, to recommend the intense Holocaust novel as “Literature” over the love story with a happy ending. If some kids at some moments need dark YA to save them (and I do believe that they do), they also sometimes need to be saved by a light or funny book about people whose lives aren’t perfect but mostly turn out all right. I know I do.

Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to “Is there anything on this list that’s not depressing?”

  1. Sue J says:

    … so, where *are* these books that aren’t depressing?

  2. Sam says:

    That’s certainly true, Jeff. I liked Roger Sutton’s line, “Give me an author who is truthful and talented; spare me an author who writes to save lives.” Or to make a point, or to teach a lesson. The author has to deliver their own story the best way they see fit.

  3. Pingback: June 2011 Carnival Of Children’s Literature BONUS edition! « Chapter Book of the Day

  4. Jeff Rivera says:

    Interesting. I agree that sometimes its harder to make people laugh than make them sad or depressed. they have their own ups and downs though and all will depend on how well the author can deliver the story well

  5. Sam says:

    We really should! That would be fun. (I was pleased to see Terry Pratchett win the Edwards award for exactly that reason.)

  6. :paula says:

    It sounds like the same old damn story about how people think humor is easy, and so True Meaning of Smekday didn’t get the Newbery, and Terry Pratchett never wins the Printz, and the Oscar always goes to some actress pretending not to be beautiful.

    We should collaborate on a Great Happy Books list!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *